Analyzing the Message in The Stem Cell Debates: Lessons for Science and Politics

• The bullet point that most fit this text is that this piece is trying to persuade readers that Stem cells are not unethical.  They do this by using facts to attempt to sway the reader because you can't argue with facts.  It is something that you have to accept if it has been researched and agreed upon.  They do have opinions that they use to sway the reader but this is their main goal.
• The goal that does not seem relevant in this piece is to analyze,synthesize, or interpret because this text looks more at a topic that the author wants to explain and persuade to the reader why stem cells are not unethical.  The author doesn't analyze the subject of stem cells because that is something that isn't seen as much in the scientific field, except in research findings when they analyze their results.
• There isn't any kind of layers or nuances in this speech because it doesn't seem that the author needs or wants to do this.  The reason for this is that the author wants to get there point across to persuade the reader so hiding layers or nuances would be pointless and actually harm the argument given.